1.
Why do you (as a Christian) believe in Bible?
3.
How do you know it is true?
4.
Let me ask you: As a police or lawyer, how do
you know whether a person is telling the truth?
5.
I think first of all, I should take note on
every word/sentence claims by that person whether they are conflicting with one
another or they are logically sound. Then later, I can also check with other
people to know more about this person whether his words can be trusted. From
other people and other evidences, I need to evaluate whether they are leading
me to agreeing with what that person has said. If the person mentioned
something or somewhere, we also need to examine whether the object or place is
what has been described.
6.
Yes reasonably we would do the things that you
have said to test whether the person is telling the truth. This is also pretty
much what a lawyer or historian does. In order to be more focused on the
central theme/figure of the Bible, you might want to ask how do we know the
accounts of Jesus in the Bible are true.
Historians’ criteria:
a)
Independent
sources: Roman and Greek writings (Examples: Thallos, Mara bar Serapion,
Tacitus, Pliny the Younger, Suetonius, Lucian of Samosata, Celsus)
b)
Independent
sources: Jewish writings (Examples: Josephus, Talmud)
c)
Accounts
of Jesus’ disciples: New Testament books and letters
Luke 1:
1 Many have
undertaken to draw up an account of the things that have been fulfilled among
us, 2 just as they were handed down to us by those who from the first were
eyewitnesses and servants of the word.
7.
You cannot use Christian sources because they
were all written by religious leaders.
8.
The New
Testament as a historical text
- The so-called
‘religious’ nature of Christian writings in no way diminishes their value as
historical sources. Historians take the Christian agenda into account when they
analyse the New Testament, just as they take the imperial bias into account
when studying Tacitus or the Jewish bias when reading Josephus, but historians
do not place the New Testament in special category. It is simplistic and
unhistorical to say that Christian bias undermines the historical worth of the
New Testament texts. In fact it is no exaggeration to say that historians
universally regard the New Testament writings as the earliest, most plentiful
and most reliable sources of information about Jesus of history.
The New Testament is a compilation of
sources
- In historical
research, the New Testament is analysed as a compilation of independent
traditions with common convictions about the Jesus of Nazareth. Christians need
to remember that, although our sacred documents were composed and circulated in
the first century, they were not brought together into a single volume (the New
Testament) until the forth century. The New Testament is a compilation of texts
that were composed and circulated independently of each other in the first
century. This is a historical significant.
9.
But there are many so many books which tell the
truth. Why do you believe in Bible more than the other books?
10.
One important point that we have discussed above
is that the truth can go through the all the tests/examinations above. And the
Bible does! Now looking at the question that you have just addressed:
Christians don’t
just believe the Bible is “true.” We believe it is the “Inspired” Word of God
Himself. Not that it is “inspiring” – but that it is actually written by God
Himself using human authors as instruments – The Word of God. This makes a huge
difference with other books.
2 Timothy 3
16 All Scripture is
God-breathed and is useful for teaching, rebuking, correcting and training in
righteousness, 17 so that the servant of God may be thoroughly equipped for every
good work.
No comments:
Post a Comment